One person holds the whole second line: the risk function, the compliance function and sometimes the money laundering reporting officer’s role too.
In a bank or building society that usually pairs the PRA’s Chief Risk function, SMF4, responsible for the overall management of the firm’s risk controls and reporting directly to the governing body, with the FCA’s compliance oversight function, SMF16, whose holder is responsible for a permanent, effective and independent compliance function. Chief Risk is a PRA function; compliance oversight and money laundering reporting, SMF17, are FCA functions, so one leader answers to both regulators.
The rules allow it: the PRA requires the Chief Risk function where proportionate and lets another senior person fulfil it where a dedicated appointment is not justified and there is no conflict of interest, and a firm with gross total assets of £250 million or less is not expected to have many senior managers beyond the mandatory three.
Candidates check the line to the board first. The head of the risk function cannot be removed without the board’s prior approval, and in all but the smallest firms the board’s oversight of the compliance function and of the risk function are two separate prescribed responsibilities held by non-executives, so we ask which chair holds each before we approach anyone.
Sources: PRA Rulebook, Senior Management Functions Part, rule 3.4, Risk Control Part, rule 3.5, and Allocation of Responsibilities Part, rules 3.2 and 4.1; FCA Handbook, SUP 10C.6 and SYSC 6.1; PRA SS28/15, April 2026, paragraph 2.7 and Tables B and E.