Risk Talent · Executive search

Executive search for heads of prudential risk

Before a head of prudential risk search begins, the firm has to decide which job the title means: writing the ICAAP and challenging the capital plan, or running the plan, the returns and the funding. RiskTAE runs retained searches for heads of prudential risk and capital management in UK banks, building societies and specialist lenders.

A partner runs the search from the written brief to the first day, and every candidate is interviewed on the substance of the ICAAP before you see a CV.

You meet people who have written the document, owned the models behind it and answered to the PRA for the numbers.

1 January 2027Basel 3.1 and the SDDT capital regime apply

The role

What does a head of prudential risk do, and who do they report to?

A head of prudential risk owns the firm’s capital and liquidity assessments: the ICAAP, the ILAAP, the stress testing behind both, the Pillar 2A and PRA buffer figures that follow the supervisory review, and often the recovery plan and the returns. In most banks the role reports to the chief risk officer, who holds the PRA’s Chief Risk function, SMF4. In some it sits in finance under the chief finance officer, SMF2, who is responsible for managing the firm’s financial resources.

The PRA says the prescribed responsibility for the production and integrity of the firm’s financial information and regulatory reporting is often shared between the Chief Finance and Chief Risk functions, and the responsibilities for capital, funding and liquidity and for the internal stress tests must sit with approved senior managers in any firm above the £250 million small-firm threshold. This role does the work beneath one or both of those people, and the brief has to say which.

The title also covers two jobs: a second-line role that writes the ICAAP and challenges the capital plan, and a first-line role that runs the plan, the returns and the funding. In a small bank one person does both. We settle which it is before the market map starts, because the strong candidates ask on the first call.

Sources: PRA Rulebook, Senior Management Functions Part, rules 3.3 and 3.4; Allocation of Responsibilities Part, rules 3.1 and 4.1; PRA SS28/15, April 2026, paragraphs 2.26 and 2.41.

Candidates

What does a strong head of prudential risk look like, and where do they come from?

The person you want has written an ICAAP from a blank page, chosen the assumptions behind the Pillar 2A add-ons and the stress scenarios, and explained the total capital requirement to a board and then to the PRA.

They come from four places, each with a gap we test for. Capital teams in large banks produce people deep in one part of the machine, the IRB reporting or a single Pillar 2A model, who may never have owned the whole document. Consultancies produce people who have written many ICAAPs for other firms and defended none as the owner. Former supervisors know which page a reviewer opens first and may never have built a model. Heads of prudential risk at smaller banks and building societies have run the whole cycle with two or three people, and the question is whether they can scale it.

The question that separates owners from reporters is the last SREP: what the PRA set for Pillar 2A and the PRA buffer, and what changed as a result. Someone who ran the returns describes the process. Someone who owned the number tells you which assumption they argued over.

Process

How does a head of prudential risk search run?

Stages of the search
StageWhat happens
BriefA 30-minute call, then a written brief: the role, first-year success, terms and timetable, plus the submission calendar, whether the firm is on Basel 3.1 or the SDDT regime from 1 January 2027, and whether the role is certified or approved.
Market mapThe people who fit, most not looking, mapped by what they have owned end to end and by the size of their current firm, so an SDDT is not sent people whose whole career is IRB. Approached without naming you until they are interested.
Technical screenEach candidate is interviewed on the substance before you see a CV, by former chief risk officers and heads of risk with model and quant specialists: their last ICAAP, the assumptions they chose and how the review went.
ShortlistA short list with our written view of each person: the submissions they owned, the ones they inherited, the models they built. Then interviews and feedback both ways.
Offer, checks and startRegulatory references over six years apply to this role too; our guide to regulatory references after PS12/26 sets out the timetable. The PRA expects a criminal record check for non-SMF holders as well. We plan the start around both and the submission calendar, and stay close through the first board paper.

Sources: PRA Rulebook, Fitness and Propriety Part, rule 2.7; PRA SS28/15, April 2026, paragraphs 4.19 and 6.5; PRA PS12/26, 22 April 2026, paragraph 2.79.

Regulatory deadline

What changes for this role on 1 January 2027?

Basel 3.1 and the SDDT capital regime apply

Two sets of final rules published on 20 January 2026 take effect that day, and this role carries most of both. Under PS1/26, risk-weighted assets are recalculated under the new standardised approaches, IRB firms meet an output floor that starts at 60% of standardised risk-weighted assets and reaches 72.5% on 1 January 2030, the refined methodology for Pillar 2A is retired and the new reporting requirements begin. The PRA has said it will not double count the same risks in Pillar 1 and Pillar 2A, so it is rebasing variable Pillar 2A and the PRA buffer through an off-cycle review that needs no full ICAAP, and PS15/26 removes the benchmarking methodology from Pillar 2A from the same date.

Under PS4/26 a small domestic deposit taker moves to the SDDT capital regime instead: standardised Pillar 1, simplified Pillar 2A methodologies, a Single Capital Buffer of at least 3.5% of risk-weighted assets, and an ICAAP and ILAAP update every two years, in force since 20 January 2026 for SDDTs other than new and growing banks.

We ask every candidate from a Basel 3.1 firm what its Pillar 2 data collection showed and what they expect the off-cycle review to do to Pillar 2A, and every candidate from an SDDT what the single buffer and the two-year cycle have changed. A career on IRB models brings less to an SDDT than a few years taking a standardised bank through a stress test. Our Basel 3.1 and ICAAP pages set out the rules.

Sources: PRA PS1/26 Implementation of Basel 3.1: final rules, 20 January 2026, paragraphs 1.23 and 1.26 and Appendix 1, Article 92; PRA PS9/24, 12 September 2024, paragraphs 6.2 and 6.6; PRA PS2/26 and PS4/26, 20 January 2026; PRA PS15/26, 28 May 2026; PRA PS20/25, 28 October 2025, paragraphs 1.38 and 4.43.

The regulator’s timetable

Does a head of prudential risk need the PRA’s approval?

Usually not. In most banks and building societies the head of prudential risk is a certification function: the firm assesses the person as fit and proper and certifies them itself, then repeats the assessment every year. The prescribed responsibilities for capital, funding and liquidity and for the internal stress tests sit with the approved senior managers above the role.

It becomes a senior management function in two cases we meet: where the firm gives the person overall responsibility for an area and they hold no other approved function, the FCA’s SMF18; and where a smaller firm’s activities do not justify a separately appointed chief risk officer and this person performs that function without a conflict of interest, SMF4. The regulator then has a statutory three months from a complete application, and the criminal record check must be no older than six months at submission.

For a certified role the constraint is usually the notice period: a head of prudential risk three months from an ICAAP submission is rarely released early, so a search that starts after the resignation lands in the middle of your own cycle. We map the two calendars in the brief.

Sources: PRA Rulebook, Certification Part, rules 2.1 and 2.2; FCA Handbook, SUP 10C.7.1R and SUP 10C.10; PRA SS28/15, April 2026, Table E; PRA PS12/26, 22 April 2026, paragraphs 2.20 and 2.85.

Failure points

What usually goes wrong when you hire a head of prudential risk?

  • The brief asks one person to own the ICAAP, the ILAAP, the recovery plan, the Basel 3.1 recalculation, the returns and the models. Nobody has done all of that well at once, and the people who have done most of it read the list and stay put. Decide which submissions the person owns and which they review.
  • The firm hires a reporter and needs an owner. Producing the returns on time and to the template is a different skill from choosing an assumption and defending it to a supervisor.
  • The assumptions leave with the last person. The FCA’s handover rule for senior managers says the material handed to a successor should include judgement and opinion, not just facts and figures. Hold this role to that standard whether or not it is approved, or the new head starts by reverse-engineering a spreadsheet.

Sources: FCA Handbook, SYSC 25.9.4R to 25.9.7G; PRA SS28/15, April 2026, paragraph 2.76.

Working with your team

How do you work with our CRO, CFO and HR team?

The chief risk officer or the chief finance officer usually owns this hire, and the other has a view, because the responsibility for financial information and regulatory reporting is so often shared between them. The chair of the risk committee, responsible under the PRA’s guidance for safeguarding the independence of the risk function, wants to know the second line will still challenge the capital plan; the board, which must approve the ILAAP, wants a document it can read.

With HR, in-house talent acquisition and RPO teams we split the work: they own the process and the offer; we bring the map of the senior prudential risk market and a technical screen a generalist team cannot run (see talent acquisition teams). If the role has grown into a chief risk officer’s job, see chief risk officer search. The same firm does advisory, training and the RisKIT models, so a search can be paired with interim advisory cover from Risk Advisory while the role is empty.

Sources: PRA SS5/16, paragraph 4.3; PRA Rulebook, Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Part, rule 13.1; PRA SS28/15, April 2026, paragraph 2.41.

FAQ

Questions about head of prudential risk search

Is a head of capital management the same role?

Often, and the title is not the test. Where the job is the capital plan, the returns and the funding, it is a first-line role and usually sits in finance; where it is the ICAAP, the stress testing and the challenge to the plan, it is second line and sits in risk. Smaller firms combine the two, and we spend more of the brief on which job it is.

Can you find a head of prudential risk for a building society or an SDDT?

Yes. The SDDT regime is open, among other tests, to UK banks and building societies with average total assets of £20 billion or less that do not use the internal ratings based approach, and a firm inside it needs someone who can run a standardised regime, a single buffer and, for all but new and growing banks, a two-year ICAAP cycle with a small team. We map people at firms of similar size and shape as well as capital specialists from larger banks.

Can you provide interim cover while the search runs?

Yes. An interim head of prudential risk can take a submission through the board while the permanent search runs. Because the role is usually certified rather than approved, the timetable is the firm’s own; where the interim would hold a senior management function, we plan both searches around the approval.

Next step

Tell us about the head of prudential risk role

In 30 minutes we will agree the brief, say how the market is likely to read it and tell you whether a retained search is the right route.

Brief us on a role

Tell us about the role and a partner will come back to you. Treated in confidence.

For example Head of prudential risk

What kind of hire?

PDF or Word, up to 2 MB

Prefer email? talent@risktae.com or +44 20 3996 9599. We use these details only to reply to you: privacy notice.